Remembering Mac Laurie, Elder

Mac Laurie, as his son Craig wrote a year ago in an email, "joined the Church Triumphant on November 12, 2022." I think of him often. He was a mentor and elder to many in his years of service to the Lord. Also he was a dear and trusted friend, my elder, and co-elder with whom I served. Mac was 97 years old when he died and had served as an elder in the Orthodox Presbyterian Church for over 50 years. You can read David Winslow's Memoriam for Mac in the December 2022 issue of New Horizon's Magazine on page 21 here.

 

I miss Mac. The Church misses Mac. And I say that because an elder is what he was, i.e. a faithful shepherd of the Lord's flock. He looked after the souls of those not only "officially" in his congregation but also of many other Christians he came to know and love over the years. 

Soon after my wife and I began attending El Camino OPC in 2010 we joined in with the Sunday school class that Mac was teaching. We were not yet members and were taking things slow. One particular Sunday Mac's class concerned the topic of God's Law. I don't remember any comment I may have offered as we discussed the topic, but it apparently registered a concern with Mac. Later that afternoon he showed up at our home. Here's what I wrote to him years later, a few weeks before his death about that incident:

I have contemplated the prospect of your going home to the Lord more than a few times this past year. After all, you had already been blessed with many years beyond the "allotted" three score and ten. One memory that kept popping up was of you coming to visit for the first time, on a Sunday after church. Barb and I had just started attending El Camino. You had led a Sunday school class in which the topic of the Law had been discussed. Concerned about my understanding of how to think on the matter, you showed up unannounced with something written by Robert Godfrey for my consideration and help. Well, only true shepherds of the Lord's sheep do that kind of thing. I knew then I had a true shepherd for an elder; an elder who became a much beloved friend.

We weren't yet members but Mac was caring for our souls, two of Christ's sheep. Shepherds do that. That incident brought to mind a quote from the 16th century Reformer Martin Bucer:

Those who are ordained to the care of souls and pastoral ministry in the church are to serve our Lord Jesus, the chief Shepherd and Bishop of our souls, in his lambs, that is, all those elected to life, in such a way that through their minsitry everything is shown and provided that our Lord has promised in his office of Shepherd. This involves being concerned and through the word of God providing that Christ's lambs, who are still straying from his flock and sheep-pen, should be gathered in... [Barb and I were not yet sheep of the fold at El Camino] - (Concerning The True Care of Souls by Martin Bucer, p 69)

Over the next 12 years Mac and I had many conversations about many things such as the gospel of Christ, understanding the meaning of the law in various parts of the Bible, and covenantal theology. He impressed me with how deeply he cared about the truth of scripture in order to better safeguard the church from error and by his willingness to adjust his understanding when convinced to do so by God's Word. Always a learner, a disciple of Christ. 

Even in his last year of life, six years after retiring from the El Camino OPC session and having moved over to the PCA, Mac was still involved, fighting battles for truth in Christ's church. Competing overtures over controversial issues regarding the qualifications for ordained ministers were being considered for the upcoming General Assembly. Mac shared with me his closing thoughts over these matters from an email he sent early in 2022 to a PCA pastor:

Dark days in the PCA, indeed, and destined to become darker, I fear. I find myself resentful that God has placed me in them. My heart cries "you've fought enough battles; you deserve to live out your remaining days free of strife." I'm not looking very good according to measure penned by Watts in his "Am I a Soldier of the Cross?"

Transparent and always ready to consider his inadequacy as a servant... When I read those words of his I thought, "no Mac... clear evidence you are indeed looking very good."

My sweetest memories are of the many times over the years that Mac, my wife and I got together for fellowship, discussions and prayer concerning our loved ones and Christ's Church. This became a regular part of our friendship. Most cherished was how Mac, in closing our times together and with pillows on the floor along side the sofa, would say,

"To our knees!"

 ... leading us into prayer.

Heavenly Father, we offer thanksgiving for Elder Mac Laurie who has departed this life in the certain hope of the resurrection. Amen.

_________________________________________

A post by Mac Laurie on The World's Ruined:  Forsaken? More Thoughts on Abhorring and Loving The Sinner - Part 5

Calvin: Substitution - Why Jesus Died A Criminal’s Death

“When we read that Christ was led away from the judgment-seat to execution, and was crucified between thieves, we have a fulfillment of the prophecy which is quoted by the Evangelist, "He was numbered with the transgressors," (Isaiah 53:12; Mark 15:28.) Why was it so? That he might bear the character of a sinner, not of a just or innocent person, inasmuch as he met death on account not of innocence, but of sin. 

“On the other hand, when we read that he was acquitted by the same lips that condemned him, (for Pilate was forced once and again to bear public testimony to his innocence,) let us call to mind what is said by another prophet, "I restored that which I took not away," (Psalm 69:4.) Thus we perceive Christ representing the character of a sinner and a criminal, while, at the same time, his innocence shines forth, and it becomes manifest that he suffers for another's and not for his own crime. He therefore suffered under Pontius Pilate, being thus, by the formal sentence of the judge, ranked among criminals, and yet he is declared innocent by the same judge, when he affirms that he finds no cause of death in him. 

“Our acquittal is in this that the guilt which made us liable to punishment was transferred to the head of the Son of God, (Isaiah 53:12.) We must specially remember this substitution in order that we may not be all our lives in trepidation and anxiety, as if the just vengeance which the Son of God transferred to himself, were still impending over us.”

John Calvin, Insitutes: Book 2.16.5

The Lord's Day Minimum Daily Requirement... Beggars Should Be Choosers (Part 3) -

In this third and last segment of "Beggars Should Be Choosers" (Part 1 and Part 2) I lay out some thoughts on the importance of what I am calling the Lord's Day Minimum Daily Requirement. There are essentials that make up a kind of necessary nutritional value when choosing a local church. They are gospel-centered and helped this beggar in choosing a church home in an ACNA congregation. 

In Part 1 and Part 2 I gave a brief historical tour of my church experience in which I drew out several lines fundamental (IMHO) to the process of choosing a church. If you are to live the Christian life then you are meant to be a Christian in a church. You will choose a church. The thesis of this 3-part post is that when it comes to finding a local church beggars (Christians) should be choosers. It's in the local church where, so to speak, the rubber meets the road.

Some considerations I previously laid out in choosing a local church were Christ-centered worship, a set liturgy with its roots in the Reformation, a liturgy that isn’t pared down to mere outline, a church holding to a Reformed confession, a gospel-centered worship around the Lord’s Supper, and preaching that presents not law as the food for faith but Christ crucified as found in the gospel. Let's take a closer look.

Christ-centered worship: How does one measure that? Without any other qualifiers this descriptor ends up merely being something in the eye of the beholder. Any serious Christian church would claim to have Christ-centered worship. So, the question is how do you define this? Let me ask another question. How did Jesus define what it means to interpret and understand the written word? Two biblical texts come to mind -

"You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness about me, yet you refuse to come to me that you may have life."  John 5:39-40

And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he interpreted to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning himself. Luke 24:27

The minimum requirement necessary to interpret the Bible is that all of Scripture points to Christ. That is the Bible's purpose. So to understand Scripture is not to ask does a particular passage point to Christ, but rather how does it point to Christ. To read Scripture with a different focus is to miss seeing Jesus. From start to finish the Bible shows sinners the way to God. And again and again it points to Jesus Christ.

Similarly, church worship ought to have ingredients that point to and focus on the crucified, risen, and ascended Lord Jesus Christ. To ignore that focus is to miss what the Church is about. We worship God in Christ, come to God through Christ, are cleansed of our sin by him, and are spiritually fed of him. To minimize this end is to relegate Jesus to the margins of worship or as someone phrased it - assume the gospel. It would be like holding a banquet feast for hungry people but leaving most of the nourishing food off the table, i.e. not served. A feast is all about the food! There may be a menu at each setting listing the delicious delights, but the paucity of nourishment actually provided causes one to remain hungry. The problem may be that those holding the banquet don't realize how hungry people are (analogy alert). Faith needs to be fed and the food is Christ. 

A set liturgy with its roots in the Reformation: Why? Well, the Reformation brought forth the clearest understanding of the gospel. And it is in the gospel that Christ Jesus is freely offered as food for saving faith; faith by which sinners lay hold of salvation. Simply put, church worship should point to Christ in the gospel as the power of God for salvation to all who believe (Rom 1:16}. Why a set liturgy? As I wrote before, few pastors are up to the task of developing a worship service that approaches what we already have been given. The temptation to innovate is great. And to innovate is an invitation to likely veer off course.

One finds in the church liturgies of the Reformation such essentials as prayer to God through the mediator Jesus Christ, corporate general confession of sin, declaration of pardon to all who believe in Christ, reading of Scripture, the declaration of God's Law, a confessional creed, praise and song to God extolling salvation in Christ, the unveiled proclamation of the gospel in both the sermon and the administration of the Lord's Supper, and a final gospel blessing declared upon the congregation. Every week... and this never gets old. Rather these gospel elements are crucial for spiritual health and life just as our daily meals are necessary for the health of the body. 

And a set Reformed liturgy serves as a kind of regulative principle protecting the believer from the less than edifying experiments or ad-libs (often weekly) that mark much of today's Protestant/Evangelical churches. 

In addition, a set Reformed liturgy serves a catechetical purpose as believers rehearse each week through prayer, confession of sin, declaration of pardon, etc. the faith once delivered. The grace and unmerited mercy of God in Christ become more internalized and deeply held through a lather, rinse, and repeat liturgical Christ-centered worship.

A liturgy that isn’t pared down to mere outline: I mention this due to the tendency in some Reformed churches to have many, if not all, of the above essentials but unfortunately in brief bits or morsels that assume too much of what is left unsaid. 

A minister of a church might say, "We know everyone here believes in the forgiveness of sins for all who repent and believe in Christ," ...

but did your parishioners hear that affirmation from you every week or did you say to yourself, as I have heard and read confessional Reformed folk say, “We all know what the gospel is. Let us get on to the Christian life?...  

There are more “tender reeds” and “dimly burning” wicks than we under shepherds know...” (R. Scott Clark)

In a word, the gospel essentials should be unambiguous, repetitive, and full. 

A church holding to a Reformed confession: It's in the confessions and catechisms of the Reformation* where one finds the clearest teaching on what is biblical Christianity. They give shape and direction to the worship of the church.** Simply put, they are essential to the church for staying the biblical course as she navigates the waters of this age.

A gospel-centered worship around the Lord’s Supper: It's unfortunate when the celebration of the Lord's Table is condensed into an all-too brief ceremony at the end of the church service, almost as if it is tacked on. Often it's reduced to little more than reciting Christ's words of institution and the distribution of the bread and cup. Why not a fuller unpacking of the mystery of this visible gospel in the prayers preceding and following the partaking? The value of this can be seen in the communion liturgy found in the 1662 Book of Common Prayer.** In other words, a fuller serving of Christ and his finished work of the cross as we eat and drink of him through faith. The remembrance of Jesus Christ in the Supper ought to be a big deal, because it is. As Michael Horton states:

“One of the reasons so many churches have gone to drama and other theatrical arts in worship is because the sermon and larger liturgical setting have failed to provide the sense that something dramatic is happening, as we gather before God.”

If time is taken, the minister's eucharistic prayers and spoken words can accomplish that.

Preaching that presents not law as the food for faith but Christ crucified as found in the gospel: In other words, not mere teachings that are more at home in a seminary class. Not sermons that are mainly admonitions to being more faithful and obedient. Not primarily moral examples from the Bible to imitate. But a clear presentation from Scripture of the sinful plight of fallen man and God's free offer of salvation in Christ to all who believe the gospel. Again, this never gets old. All of scripture points to Jesus Christ. And all the Church needs is Jesus Christ.

See also - Preaching: Potent Law and Gospel and The Persuasion of the Gospel (3)

________________________________________

* The ACNA holds to a Reformed confession of faith in the Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion - “Continental historians, both Protestant and Catholic, rank the Church of England among the Reformed Churches as distinct from the Lutheran, and her Articles are found in every collection of Reformed Confessions." (Philip Schaff as quoted by J.I. Packer in his book The Thirty-Nine Articles - Their Place and Use Today, p 33) - https://theworldsruined.blogspot.com/2021/08/the-case-for-reformedcalvinist-roots-of.html

**“The Book of Common Prayer liturgy is primarily a theological work, in that it was doctrine that guided Cranmer’s liturgical writings.”  G. W. Bromily, Thomas Cranmer: Theologian.

________________________________

What Is "Acceptable Worship"?

Thoughts on an Acceptable Worship:

"We all agree there should be truth in worship. But shouldn’t worship also be in truth? There’s a big difference between having truth in worship and worshipping in truth. Having truth in worship means you got some Bible in there. But worshiping in truth means the whole thing is by the Book. So the Bible commands us to worship acceptably (Heb 12). When the Bible commands acceptably, the Bible means the Bible. Where else would the Bible appeal the command than itself?

"And there is order in Hebrews 12’s exposition of worship. We are called to offer “acceptable worship with reverence and awe, for our God is a consuming fire.” Acceptable means worship accordingly. Reverence and awe means formality. Consuming fire means you should smell the charred remains of Nadab and Abihu in the smoke and tremble before your God asking only one question, “Has God commanded this worship?”" - Jared Beaird, The Antecedent To Worship 

Although I agree with the teaching that Rev. Beaird goes on to make in his essay regarding Reformed liturgical worship, I'm not sure that the writer's focus in Hebrews 12 is the regulative principle. Here's verse 28 that he refers to:

"Wherefore, receiving a kingdom that cannot be shaken, let us have grace [or gratitude], whereby we may offer worship well-pleasing [acceptable] to God with reverence and awe." - Heb 12:28

It strikes me, that this verse follows on heels of the overall gospel theme of Hebrews, that of the necessity of faith in Christ alone for acceptance with God (as opposed to the ceremonial law-keeping of the Old Covenant); i.e. a lively faith in Jesus' blood shedding sacrifice for sins once for all, his eternal priesthood, and his mediation as revealed in the much more excellent New Covenant.

Here are some earlier verses in Hebrews that depict this theme of faith in Christ for our acceptance with God:

"so that you may not be sluggish, but imitators of those who through faith and patience inherit the promises." - Heb 6:12

"a better hope is introduced, through which we draw near to God... but he holds his priesthood permanently, because he continues forever. Consequently, he is able to save to the uttermost those who draw near to God through him, since he always lives to make intercession for them." - Heb 7:19b, 24-25

"Therefore he is the mediator of a new covenant, so that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance... For Christ has entered, not into holy places made with hands, which are copies of the true things, but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God on our behalf." - Heb 9:15a, 24

"let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, with our hearts sprinkled clean from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water... but my righteous one shall live by faith,

and if he shrinks back,

my soul has no pleasure in him.”

But we are not of those who shrink back and are destroyed, but of those who have faith and preserve their souls. "- Heb 10:22, 38-39

"And without faith [in Christ alone] it is impossible to please him, for whoever would draw near to God must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who seek him." - Heb 11:6

And of course, "looking to Jesus, the founder and perfecter of our faith" -Heb 12:2 that is at the beginning of the chapter under consideration.

Here is what John Calvin writes in his commentary on Hebrews 12:28 -

 

"He makes hence a transition to another exhortation, that we are to lay hold on that kingdom which cannot be shaken; for the Lord shakes us for this end, that he may really and forever establish us in himself. At the same time I prefer a different reading, which is given by the ancient Latin version, "Receiving a kingdom, we have grace," etc. When read affirmatively, the passage runs best, -- "We, in embracing the Gospel, have the gift of the Spirit of Christ, that we may reverently and devoutly worship God." If it be read as an exhortation, "Let us have," it is a strained and obscure mode of speaking. The Apostle means in short, as I think, that provided we enter by faith into Christ's kingdom, we shall enjoy constant grace, which will effectually retain us in the service of God; for as the kingdom of Christ is above the world, so is the gift of regeneration."

And what does Scripture mean by to worship in truth? Looking to the apostle John:

"Ye worship that which ye know not: we worship that which we know; for salvation is from the Jews. But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and truth: for such doth the Father seek to be his worshippers." - John 4:22-23

Those born of the Spirit and faith in Jesus are the true worshipers of God.

Again, John Calvin:

"It amounts to this, that God is not properly worshipped but by the certainty of faith, which cannot be produced in any other way than by the word of God...

"Now that they [the Jews] deny the Son, they have nothing in common with the Father... The same judgment must be formed concerning all who have turned aside from the pure faith of the Gospel to their own inventions and the traditions of men.

"The worship of God is said to consist in the spirit, because it is nothing else than that inward faith of the heart which produces prayer, and, next, purity of conscience and self-denial, that we may be dedicated to obedience to God as holy sacrifices...

In all ages God wished to be worshipped by faith, prayer, thanksgiving, purity of heart, and innocence of life; and at no time did he delight in any other sacrifices.

To worship God through faith in Christ alone is what makes our prayers, thanksgivings, and praises to be well-pleasing and acceptable to him.

Finally, Rev. Beaird's thoughts on a gospel-centered liturgical worship are excellent.  I very much appreciate these words near the end:

"I prefer a liturgy structured: gospel, law, gospel. To begin and end with the gospel secures me in my only comfort in life and in death...

"Here’s my application, turn the gospel up to eleven every Lord’s Day. And for that, you will need a proper biblical liturgy." 

The article is well worth reading > The Antecedent to Worship

Beggars Should Be Choosers (Part 2)

From the previous post - "Yet when it comes to a finding home church, I want to suggest that Christians (beggars all) indeed should be choosers!"

Picking up where I left off (Part 1 - here) in my non-magical liturgical history tour: 

We eventually landed in a small Anglican church. It was there that we began to not only appreciate but value the weekly repetition of the Holy Communion service in Book of Common Prayer - the reading of the Law, the unabashed and fully biblical general confession of sin, the declaration of absolution with the comforting words of Scripture, and the thoroughly gospel-centered Holy Communion liturgy.

The effect of this historic and Reformed liturgy was like participating in a weekly catechism of the faith once delivered to the saints. The liturgical worship assumed nothing, but rather led the believers through the essential cycle of the Christian life: repentance, forgiveness, and gospel grounded obedience. That path was via the reading of the Law with its holy standard of perfection (Lord have mercy), the confession of sin which highlighted not only sins “done and undone” but ourselves as “miserable offenders”, the declaration of pardon for all those who trust in the gospel of Christ, the confession of faith (Nicene Creed), a full presentation of the gospel of Christ as the church worships at the Lord’s Table, and the final corporate prayer of thanksgiving acknowledging the great salvation that God has given us through the merits of our Lord Jesus Christ. Finally beseeching God for grace to “do all such good works as thou has prepared for us to walk in through Jesus Christ.

It was during this time that we were more and more moving towards the Reformed faith. There were many influences. Our son-in-law was attending Westminster Seminary California. So through that connection we began reading books on the Reformed faith, listening to the White Horse Inn, and eventually attending some of WSC’s annual winter conferences. At the same time due to our connection to Anglicanism I began exploring the riches of the English Reformation.

It was at this point, despite our love of the BCP liturgy, that the lack of Protestant identification in this particular Anglican church became a deal-breaker for continued membership. The Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion (a Reformed confession of faith) and other Reformed marks of religion were at best historical footnotes, at worse totally ignored.

Wanting to be in a church that was more seriously confessional and identifiable as Reformed, we eventually pulled up stakes and landed in the Orthodox Presbyterian Church and then a number of years later after relocating in the Presbyterian Church in America.

For quite a while we confessionally had accepted not only the the Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion but also the Westminster Standards. I wanted to be in a church that overtly held to a Reformed confession so at least when there was debate over doctrine or practice there would be an agreed upon arbitrator and guide. Everyone can claim to be biblical. Reformed confessions define what biblical means. Now we were in such a church… yes, a church holding to a Reformed confession but also were in a church that, though having a traditional liturgy, was less liturgically gospel-centered (think assumed gospel).

Okay, this a-little-history section has stretched on longer than I planned. But certain important threads weave through it. Christ-centered worship, a set liturgy with its roots in the Reformation, a liturgy that isn’t pared down to mere outline, a church holding to a Reformed confession, a gospel-centered worship around the Lord’s Supper, and preaching that presents not law as the food for faith but Christ crucified as found in the gospel.

to be continued... [Part 1 and Part 3]

Beggars Should Be Choosers (Part 1)

There’s truth in the saying, “Beggars can’t be choosers”. In other words, those in want should learn to be content with what is offered to them. Yet when it comes to finding a home church, I want to suggest that Christians (beggars all) indeed should be choosers! It’s with that thought I've entered the latter years of life, finding myself ever more dependent on and thirsting for the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ and, as Paul wrote, him crucified; to find a church where the gospel, in word and sacrament, is central for the nourishing of one’s faith and comforting of the soul. This consideration is what has recently led me into fellowship with an Anglican congregation in the ACNA. But before unpacking the whys and wherefores of that decision first…

A little history:
My wife and I spent our early years as adult believers in a church group outside of institutional Christianity in what some call the house church movement. Looking back (the decade of the 1970s) we naively assumed our corporate experience reflected that of the first century church. We had a love of the saints and a joyful corporate worship. We believed in the centrality of Christ in Scripture and that our salvation was complete in him. We didn't need creeds or confessions. We had Christ! Yet we lacked a solid foundation in the doctrines of grace and had a very low view of the sacraments. There was a simplicity in our worship (no guitars or other instruments - only a cappella singing) eschewing the “restrictive liturgical structure” of the organized Church. In practice the focus was on a subjective “experience of the Lord”. Too often that subjective experience (feelings) shaped our walk, defining faith and truth rather than Scripture. Ah, the blinkered idealism and ignorance of the young and some not so young. As our time there came to an end I was coming to understand that our brand, if you would, had some weaknesses.

Two years later I was in seminary for a Masters program in Biblical Counseling. After graduating we eventually found ourselves helping organize a small home church. This lasted for about three years or so. As with most non-institutional churches our little group ran its course, leaving us churchless. Now for something completely different!

Turning to organized Christianity, we began the somewhat foreign task of searching for a church. We sampled many of the offerings - Baptist, Independent Bible, Plymouth Brethren, Presbyterian, Eastern Orthodox, mega and small… and often we stayed home.

On Sundays as we set out to try a new church we would tell the children that we were going on another church “field trip”. Our attempts at pumping up their enthusiasm had limited success. Over time the children were less enthused and less amused. And my earnestness was likewise waning. I was already skeptical of organized Christianity and now I was becoming disillusioned. The similar rote offerings of songs, hymns, specials, announcements, gospel-less sermons, and the rare Lord’s Supper more often than not left us wanting. Where was the Lord in all this? Were my expectations unrealistic?

One Sunday morning we attended a service at an Episcopal church. It was the first time experiencing an Episcopal worship service (first for me, I think my wife had already been visiting). To say the least, I was sincerely surprised as the worship worked its way through the liturgy found in the Book of Common Prayer. I remember turning to my wife at one point and saying with surprise, “This is so Christ-centered!” It wasn’t supposed to be that way. After all, this service-in-a-book was the height of institutionalized and supposed fossilized Christianity! A change of mind had slowly begun. I tucked the observation away.

What followed were several years without regular church attendance. We bought a sailboat and lived on it. That was my diversion. Our boat slip was not far from the Episcopal church mentioned above. Spiritually, I was at best treading water. My wife was attending church, certainly more often than I.

Three years later, after moving across country, our church search started afresh. God (my dear wife as his instrument) was renewing in me a heart for Christ and his church. Below is something I jotted down and showed her during a visit to one evangelical church as the service plodded along:

“When one takes away the liturgy [the BCP in mind] with its Christ/Scripture centered content it is difficult, if not impossible, to replace it with something that doesn’t fall short of a holy worship - a definite problem for the modern church.”

In a word, when it comes to Sunday weekly services, modern day liturgies often tend to be pared down and rather shallow liturgical outlines which fall short of a hoped-for-worship of God centered around the finished work of Jesus Christ. Their default setting consists in some combination of hymns, praise choruses, a teaching, maybe a “special” performance, prayers for various causes or sick members, an offering, announcements (the Lord’s Supper a rarity) which settles into a kind of going down the list and check-marking the boxes. In the words of Dr. Michael Horton, the gospel is assumed if not forgotten. Well-intentioned but misguided Lite-Law-teaching all too often is the main staple of sermons. All in all, it can be more like attending a Christian Rotary Club meeting than participating in a Christ centered corporate worship of our God and Savior.

to be continued... [ Part 2 and Part 3 ]

John Calvin on Law and Gospel

Section 7. Thus the Law is a kind of mirror.

As in a mirror we discover any stains upon our face, so in the Law we behold, first, our impotence; then, in consequence of it, our iniquity; and, finally, the curse, as the consequence of both...

Section 8. When the Law discloses our guilt, we should not despond, but flee to the mercy of God. 

How this may be done.  

But while the unrighteousness and condemnation of all are attested by the law, it does not follow (if we make the proper use of it) that we are immediately to give up all hope and rush headlong on despair. No doubt, it has some such effect upon the reprobate, but this is owing to their obstinacy. With the children of God the effect is different. The Apostle testifies that the law pronounces its sentence of condemnation in order "that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God," (Rom 3: 19). In another place, however, the same Apostle declares, that "God has concluded them all in unbelief;" not that he might destroy all, or allow all to perish, but that "he might have mercy upon all," (Rom 11:32): in other words, that divesting themselves of an absurd opinion of their own virtue, they may perceive how they are wholly dependent on the hand of God; that feeling how naked and destitute they are, they may take refuge in his mercy, rely upon it, and cover themselves up entirely with it; renouncing all righteousness and merit, and clinging to mercy alone, as offered in Christ to all who long and look for it in true faith. In the precepts of the law, God is seen as the rewarder only of perfect righteousness, (a righteousness of which all are destitute), and, on the other hand, as the stern avenger of wickedness. But in Christ his countenance beams forth full of grace and gentleness towards poor unworthy sinners.

John Calvin. Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book 2.7.7 & 8

To Portray the Image of God...

Portraying the Image of God

In the 2nd Commandment God forbids the making of any image and the worshipping of it. It is one of the eight "Thou shalt nots" - prohibitions against certain thoughts and actions because they are sins - in the Ten Commandments, violations of God's moral will for man. To focus on them, rather than instilling obedience, brings us crashing head on into a brick wall of our disobedience! (Romans 5:20). 

The 2nd Commandment:

 

“You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. You shall not bow down to them or serve them, for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and the fourth generation of those who hate me, but showing steadfast love to thousands of those who love me and keep my commandments."

Why the prohibition against the making and use of images of God? As we said, it is sin. And any image made by man can only misrepresent the invisible Almighty God. Additionally, to include images in our worship directs us away from God's picture of himself he intended for man. 

We use our eyes more than any other part of our bodies to understand how to relate to our world. And when it comes to relating to God we may underestimate the attraction of  physical "seeing" or what 1 John 2:16 calls the lust of the eyes! John Calvin sheds some light on why the desire for images and other adornments in worship are so strong even among believers.

- the words of Moses (Gen 31: 19), When he relates that Rachel stole her father's images, he speaks of the use of idols as a common vice. Hence we may infer, that the human mind is, so to speak, a perpetual forge of idols…

They [the Israelites] knew, indeed, that there was a God whose mighty power they had experienced in so many miracles, but they had no confidence of his being near to them, if they did not with their eyes behold a corporeal symbol of his presence, as an attestation to his actual government. They desired, therefore, to be assured by the image which went before them, that they were journeying under Divine guidance. (Institutes of Religion, Book 1.11.8)

Lacking the inherent confidence that God really is near to us and for us, we, like the Israelites (given our bent), often seek a prop, something we can behold or grasp to assist and assure us. Rather than trusting in his Word alone we augment it with what seem benign additions, e.g.  images and visual aids which, more or less, have become widespread standard fare in Christianity. Are images of Jesus/God really so bad? Well, yes... not only because they fall short of God’s mark, but these images, as well as many other outward visual "good idea" props (various adornments accompanying church worship), at a minimum distract from or undermine the means of imaging or portraying God revealed in his Word. Back to Calvin:

Paul declares, that by the true preaching of the gospel Christ is portrayed and in a manner crucified before our eyes, (Galatians 3:1.) Of what use, then, were the erection in churches of so many crosses of wood and stone, silver and gold, if this doctrine were faithfully and honestly preached, viz., Christ died that he might bear our curse upon the tree, that he might expiate our sins by the sacrifice of his body, wash them in his blood, and, in short, reconcile us to God the Father? From this one doctrine the people would learn more than from a thousand crosses of wood and stone. As for crosses of gold and silver, it may be true that the avaricious give their eyes and minds to them more eagerly than to any heavenly instructor. (Book 1.11.7)

And the apostle Paul adds that in his preaching to the Galatians that Christ crucified was pictured:

O foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you? It was before your eyes that Jesus Christ was publicly portrayed as crucified.

God images and portrays himself to us not in paintings or drawings, but in the gospel. God assures us of his love in the gospel. It is in the gospel that he shows himself in Christ to us. Rather than with physical eyes, we see him with the eyes of faith. And we are assured of his nearness to us through hearing and believing the word of Christ (Romans 10:17).

Philip *said to Him, “Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us.” Jesus *said to him, “Have I been so long with you, and yet you have not come to know Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father; how can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? (John 14:8-9)

The gospel is God's means of showing Christ to us. Christ alone is the image of the invisible God (Colossians 1:15a) and he is seen only through eyes of faith in the gospel.

James Ussher and the Reformed Tradition, Anglicanism, and Justification…

James Ussher is in some ways the forgotten man of Anglicanism, otherwise known during his time as the Church of England/Church of Ireland. Why do I say that? Well, because among much of today’s Anglicanism his influence is simply overlooked. One reason may be that Anglicanism in many of its modern variations has moved away from identifying as a Reformed Protestant Church. And Ussher was certainly Reformed and arguably the most influential Reformed Anglican theologian of the 1600s. And as such he doesn’t fit the latitudinal templates of recent times. As to his influence outside of Anglicanism, even though he didn’t attend, Ussher’s theology had a significant impact on the Westminster Assembly and thus the resulting Confession of Faith. For some Anglicans that’s just a bit too “Reformed!”

All that to introduce the following excerpt from Harrison Perkins’ book James Ussher and the Reformed Tradition (page 78). One of the big debates at the Westminster Assembly was over a question concerning the imputation of Christ’s active or positive obedience to the believer as necessary for his justification. This was just one area of doctrine where Ussher’s theology was influential. Ussher connects Christ’s active obedience (fulfillment of the Covenant of Works where Adam failed) with the justification of those who trust in Christ. Perkins writes:

The second point drawn from the eschatological dimension of a covenant is the importance of the concept of justification.186 Because Ussher argued that justification was a status that Adam could achieve in his state of innocence, justification cannot be limited to the remission of sins. Justification includes the attainment of positive righteousness. If Adam had completed his task, he would have fulfilled everything the law demanded; he would be justified. This is one factor that makes the doctrine of the imputation of Christ’s active obedience so important within the full scheme of Ussher’s doctrinal system. To attain an eternal condition of blessedness a person must be declared perfectly righteous,which remains the case even after the covenant of works was broken. The first Adam was the representative head that was supposed to fulfill the law for his posterity in the first covenant. According to Ussher, justification became a benefit of salvation in the covenant of grace because Christ was the second Adam who did fulfill the law and transfers that righteous status to all who accept it by faith.

186 The doctrine of justification and its links to the covenant of works are considered again in more extensive detail in Chapter 6. 

187 Snoddy, Soteriology, 113-22.

188 CUL MS Mn.6.55, fol. 29r (sermon on Genesis 6:5, dated August 1642).

___________________________________________________________

The Irish Articles of Religion 1615, authored by James Ussher:

Article 21. Man being at the beginning created according to the image of God (which consisted especially in the wisdom of his mind and the true holiness of his free will), had the covenant of the law ingrafted in his heart, whereby God did promise unto him everlasting life upon condition that lie performed entire and perfect obedience unto his Commandments, according to that measure of strength wherewith he was endued in his creation, and threatened death unto him if he did not perform the same.

Article 35. Although this justification be free unto us, yet it cometh not so freely unto us that there is no ransom paid therefore at all. God showed his great mercy in delivering ns from our former captivity without requiring of any ransom to be paid or amends to be made on our parts; which thing by us had been impossible to be done. And whereas all the world was not able of themselves to pay any part towards their ransom, it pleased our heavenly Father of his infinite mercy, without any desert of ours, to provide for us the most precious merits of his own Son, whereby our ransom might be fully paid, the law fulfilled, and his justice fully satisfied. So that Christ is now the righteousness of all them that truly believe in him. He, for them, paid their ransom by his death. He, for them, fulfilled the law in his life; that now, in him, and by him, every true Christian man may be called a fulfiller of the law: forasmuch as that which our infirmity was not able to effect, Christ's justice hath performed. And thus the justice and mercy of God do embrace each other: the grace of God not shutting out the justice of God in the matter of our justification, but only shutting out the justice of man (that is to say, the justice of our own works) from being any cause of deserving our justification.

Our Daily Descent

 “What is man?”, the palmist asks. In this life I doubt we come to the full answer. John Calvin pointed in the right direction when he wrote that in order to get an idea of 'us' we need to start with God. For the truth of the matter is - "it is he that hath made us, and not we ourselves"  [Psalm 100].

"Our wisdom, in so far as it ought to be deemed true and solid Wisdom, consists almost entirely of two parts: the knowledge of God and of ourselves. But as these are connected together by many ties, it is not easy to determine which of the two precedes and gives birth to the other. For, in the first place, no man can survey himself without forthwith turning his thoughts towards the God in whom he lives and moves; because it is perfectly obvious, that the endowments which we possess cannot possibly be from ourselves; nay, that our very being is nothing else than subsistence in God alone." - Institutes of the Christian Religion by John Calvin, Book 1.1

If self-knowledge begins with God, then apart from God any view of ourselves is distorted. The high regard we hold ourselves in since the Fall not only muddies a right understanding but is at the core of what ails us as sinners.  

I recently reread C.S. Lewis' That Hideous Strength. I picked it up again because the theme revolving around the N.I.C.E. reminded me of the still ongoing CDC involvement in the Covid 19 pandemic mandates. But I digress. What is relevant to this post is a small excerpt:

“There,” he said, “a very simple adjustment. Humans want crumbs removed; mice are anxious to remove them…”

“How huge we must seem to them,” said Jane.

This inconsequent remark had a very curious cause. Hugeness was what she was thinking of and for one moment it had seemed she was thinking of her own hugeness in comparison with the mice. But almost at once this identification collapsed. She was really thinking simply of hugeness. Or rather, she was not thinking of it. She was, in some strange fashion, experiencing it. Something intolerably big, something from Brobdingnag was pressing on her, was approaching, was almost in the room. She felt herself shrinking, suffocated, emptied of all power and virtue. She darted a glance at the Director which was really a cry for help, and that glance, in some inexplicable way, revealed him as being, like herself, a very small object. The whole room was a tiny place, a mouse’s hole, and it seemed to her to be tilted aslant — as though the insupportable mass and splendour of this formless hugeness, in approaching, had knocked it askew. She heard the Director’s voice.

“Quick,” he said gently,“you must leave me now. This is no place for us small ones, but I am inured. Go! - That Hideous Strength by C.S. Lewis. Chapter 8 The Pendragon

The presence of God was pressing upon Jane which necessitated a shrinking or humbling experience, a reorientation. Her inflated sense of self rapidly shrank to that of a mouse. She was uncomfortably thrown off balance as the Divine hugeness descended into that room. Jane, a sinner, was experiencing the beginning of self-knowledge which only comes when one encounters God. She was descending. John Calvin wrote:

… the inference to be drawn is that men are never duly touched and impressed with a conviction of their insignificance, until they have contrasted themselves with the majesty of God. (Calvin, Book 1.1)

To come into the presence of our Creator shatters any illusion of creaturely independence and self-sufficiency. We are not our own and are undone before him. Apart from him we have no existence (Col 1:16-17). It is God who created us, as Genesis 1 teaches, and not we ourselves. The Christian life is one of being brought low to a restored (saved) position with God who is the only point of reference for all of creation.

The psalmist asks the question,  

what is man that you are mindful of him,
and the son of man that you care for him?

Yet you have made him a little lower than the heavenly beings
and crowned him with glory and honor (Psalm 8:4-5) ESV

 "Lower than..." Our problem is not that we think too lowly of ourselves but too highly. We lift ourselves up. Yet God would have us brought lower (Luke 9:48b). Ever since Adam sinned man’s default orientation is to magnify himself. Most naturally we minimize our flaws and sins as we exalt ourselves in relation to others. Like crazed men we flee our created state of absolute dependence on God thinking our good lies in the opposite direction. 

This brings me to Thomas Cranmer’s 1662 BCP Office of Morning Prayer. In this daily liturgy the Christian is given a path of reorientation or, more to the point, sanctification through the confession of sin and trust in the gospel. 

At the beginning of MP there are several opening Scripture verses that essentially diagnose our condition and plight as sinners. We need forgiveness and we need righteousness. The standard of the Law is put before us:

When a wicked person turns away from the wickedness he has committed and does what is just and right, he shall save his life. (Ezekiel 18:27) ESV 

How does a sinner do this? He can’t. Morning Prayer then moves to an admonition, an appeal to all present to come down off our thrones. We are exhorted 

that we should not dissemble nor cloak [our sins and sinfulness] before the face of Almighty God our heavenly Father; but confess them with an humble, lowly, penitent, and obedient heart; to the end that we may obtain forgiveness of the same, by his infinite goodness and mercy. 

Our descent continues.

By nature we dissemble as to our true condition. Just think how difficult it is to honestly confess our sin to one we have offended. We don't want to go that low. We cloak and minimize our sin. In a word we need to approach the throne of grace with a sense of our dependency upon God: 

Turn thou us unto thee, O LORD, and we shall be turned; renew our days as of old (Lam 5:21).  

Make haste to help me, O Lord, my salvation! (Psalm 38:22)

Or as Augustine wrote, "God command what you will and grant what you command." 

The General Confession of Sin follows:

ALMIGHTY and most merciful Father; We have erred, and strayed from thy ways like lost sheep. We have followed too much the devices and desires of our own hearts. We have offended against thy holy laws. We have left undone those things which we ought to have done; And we have done those things which we ought not to have done; And there is no health in us. But thou, O Lord, have mercy upon us, miserable offenders. Spare thou them, O God, which confess their faults. Restore thou them that are penitent; According to thy promises declared unto mankind in Christ Jesus our Lord. And grant, O most merciful Father, for his sake; That we may hereafter live a godly, righteous, and sober life, To the glory of thy holy Name. Amen.

The confession of sin culminates in the acknowledgment of our condition. Due to our rebellion from God our Creator there is no health in us… we are miserable offenders. Brought lower still to our fallen, creaturely, and God-dependent state, the remedy of the gospel as declared in Christ Jesus is set forth! The minister then declares that through faith in Christ sins are forgiven: God pardoneth and absolveth all them that truly repent, and unfeignedly believe his holy Gospel! The power to forgive sins is in the gospel.

I find it both amazing and uplifting that we then find only two psalms actually printed out in the 1662 BCP Morning Prayer office: Psalm 95 and 100. And they both echo the same truth.

Psalm 95 

6. O come, let us worship and fall down : and kneel before the LORD our Maker.
7. For he is the Lord our God : and we are the people of his pasture, and the sheep of his hand. 

Psalm 100 

2. Be ye sure that the Lord he is God : it is he that hath made us, and not we ourselves; we are his people, and the sheep of his pasture.  

As his creatures, his sheep, his people our blessing is found with and in Christ Jesus alone who "being found in human form, humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross" (Phil 2:8). 

For he has made us and not we ourselves.

Psalm 100

Jubilate Deo
O BE joyful in the Lord, all ye lands : serve the Lord with gladness, and come before his presence with a song.
Be ye sure that the Lord he is God : it is he that hath made us, and not we ourselves; we are his people, and the sheep of his pasture.
O go your way into his gates with thanksgiving, and into his courts with praise : be thankful unto him, and speak good of his Name.
or the Lord is gracious, his mercy is everlasting : and his truth endureth from generation to generation.

Update Oct.5, 2022:

John Calvin on the meaning to be taken from Psalm 100, "it is he that hath made us, and not we ourselves; we are his people, and the sheep of his pasture."

Hence the Psalmist, after saying that the Lord "has made us," to deprive us of all share in the work, immediately adds, "not we ourselves." That he is speaking of regeneration, which is the commencement of the spiritual life, is obvious from the context, in which the next words are, "we are his people, and the sheep of his pasture," (Psalm 100:3.) Not contented with simply giving God the praise of our salvation, he distinctly excludes us from all share in it, just as if he had said that not one particle remains to man as a ground of boasting. The whole is of God. Institutes: Christian Religion, Book 2.3.6